aaus-list @ ukrainianstudies.org -- [aaus-list] [Fwd: failure notice]

["Rubchak, Bohdan" <kalush@uic.edu>]

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: failure notice
From:    MAILER-DAEMON@smtpout-1.priv.cc.uic.edu
Date:    Sun, July 22, 2007 4:23 pm
To:      kalush@uic.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtpout-1.priv.cc.uic.edu.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<aauss-list@ukrainianstudies.org>:
208.67.225.160 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 5.1.1 <aauss-list@ukrainianstudies.org>... User unknown
Giving up on 208.67.225.160.

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <kalush@uic.edu>
Received: (qmail 24929 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2007 16:23:40 -0500
Received: from mail-4.cc.uic.edu (HELO webmail.uic.edu) (128.248.155.184)
  by smtpout-1.cc.uic.edu with SMTP; 22 Jul 2007 16:23:40 -0500
Received: from pool-68-162-52-15.nwrk.east.verizon.net ([68.162.52.15])
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalush)
        by webmail.uic.edu with HTTP;
        Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:23:40 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <50063.68.162.52.15.1185139420.squirrel@webmail.uic.edu>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:23:40 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [Fwd: failure notice]
From: "Rubchak, Bohdan" <kalush@uic.edu>
To: aauss-list@ukrainianstudies.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal


I am sorry but the first mailing of this letter is obviously incomplete.
Is this an omen? In any event, I am trying again.

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: failure notice
From:    MAILER-DAEMON@smtpout-2.priv.cc.uic.edu
Date:    Sun, July 22, 2007 4:05 pm
To:      kalush@uic.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtpout-2.priv.cc.uic.edu.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<auss-list@ukrainianstudies.org>:
208.67.225.160 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 5.1.1 <auss-list@ukrainianstudies.org>... User unknown
Giving up on 208.67.225.160.

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <kalush@uic.edu>
Received: (qmail 11324 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2007 16:05:45 -0500
Received: from mail-2.cc.uic.edu (HELO webmail.uic.edu) (128.248.155.183)
  by smtpout-2.cc.uic.edu with SMTP; 22 Jul 2007 16:05:45 -0500
Received: from pool-68-162-52-15.nwrk.east.verizon.net ([68.162.52.15])
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalush)
        by webmail.uic.edu with HTTP;
        Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:05:45 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <50004.68.162.52.15.1185138345.squirrel@webmail.uic.edu>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:05:45 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: [aaus-list] Fwd: To My Beloved AmeriKan UnKle
From: "Rubchak, Bohdan" <kalush@uic.edu>
To: auss-list@ukrainianstudies.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal

Mykolo,

This letter (my last on the subject) will be straight talk, without any
tongue-in-cheek "discourse" stylizations.

First, I am happy to inform you that I am neither your uncle, nor your
beloved. More to the point, I am not your AmeriKan unKle, although God
knows that you have assembled a whole bunch of those, including one called
Sam.

Because your letter to me speaks for itself and needs no elucidation, let
me turn to another of your Texts (which I recently circulated through the
list), in which you emote about Grandma embroidering Ukrainian towels,
waiting for you to come home from glorious battles against American
turkeys (and pork chops and steaks). There you muse on what would have
happened to you if you had permanently settled in the United States: you
would have probably wound up teaching in a "provincial" college or editing
a diasporan periodical. This is by no means your first snide dig against
your AmeriKan unKles (and aunts), without whose generous help, hospitality
and initial funding you would have found it much more difficult to climb
the lofty heights of the Numero Uno European Public Intellectual. Only
this time, in order to put us down once and for all and in your desperate
reach at wit, you summon the aid of Nabokov's nefariously xenophobic
attack on the early (Ukrainian) Hogol, with which even my Russophilic
American professors felt rather uncomfortable. And this is really bad.

Let me inform you that over the years we have done somewhat better than
that. In my estimation, there are only two major universities (Princeton
and Stanford) where Ukrainian diasporans or their immediate descendants
have been absent from faculty or library staffs. As for diasporan
periodicals, you still have a long way to go before you see in Ukraine the
caliber of intellectual journal that Suchasnist' was in its heyday. That
one, I am afraid, you would not have been invited to edit, because a Yurij
Shevelov you ain't! I wonder what purpose such opinions, which you
stubbornly disseminate in Ukrainian publications, are supposed to serve.
In any event, they are surprisingly close to the "travelogues" that Vitaly
Korotych used to write about the sorry lot of Ukrainians in foreign lands.
But he wrote them in different times and with much more obvious intent.

Returning for a moment to your America-bashing, you are obviously aping
the fashion among some European intellectuals, in whose ranks you have
decided to enroll (the insufferably patronizing tone of your Vyshenskian
missiles and your censorial pompousness in public discussions testify to
your view of yourself as one). But there are some important differences
between your models and yourself, the most outstanding being that they do
know what they are talking about. Even if, in my opinion, some of their
criticisms of America  may be  wrong, most of them are informed,
thoughtful, responsible, and hence sometimes even useful. Your
America-bashing, to the contrary, shows no substance whatever, and
therefore is doomed to remain on the level of tabloid babbling.

I implore you, Mykolo, to write what you know. Stay with your originally
interesting and valuable idea of the creolization of Ukrainians as a
minority in their own country until this idea, with a decade or so of
overuse, wears out completely. Then strain very hard, and maybe you'll
come up with a new one. Pose if you must, but do so more impressively.

There is one really serious insult in your letter which finally must be
addressed - I have in mind the deliberate misspelling of a consonant. The
word "Amerika," which you probably picked up from the hysterical Harold
Pinter, and which originates with Kafka's English translator, takes me
back to a very tragic time in my country, to the noble rebellion of
American youth against a foolish government, which I witnessed and in
which I marginally participated. Don't go there, Mykolo, for it is none of
your goddamn business. You have enough on your plate, what with dealing
with the embarrassing mess in your own country, and saving the noble
intent of the Orange Revolution. Stay with that!

VERY sincerely,

Bohdan